The Rage of the Soul

from: extremeinstability

Those times, when the rage comes around,

so great, it's near impossible to control,

don't let the despair overcome you; know

it's the god within your soul;

It's the force of creation awakening

there, trapped in the shell of the human --

it's the sustaining spirit in

despair, for the bondage it suffers,

the blindness of flesh,

the myth of happy-ever-after,

the rope of time,

the windowless buildings

of society's rights

and wrongs.

(readywisconsin)

Like all caged beasts, it is prone to rebellion.

Ride the wave of its energy, channel

it through the inlets and byways

of art and society.  Put it to use,

so it doesn't use you, and it will

be 

the beauty that you leave

on the face of the earth.

 (also from extremeinstability -- a fascinating website!)

excerpt one: "The Sole Origin is Sound" by Hazrat Inayat Khan

"The life absolute from which has sprung all that is felt, seen, and perceived,

and into which all again merges in time,

is a silent, motionless, and eternal life . . . .

Ever motion that springs forth from this silent life is a vibration and a creator of vibrations.

As motion causes motion, so the silent life becomes active in a certain part

and creates every moment more and more activity,

losing thereby the peace of the original silent life.

It is the grade of activity of these vibrations that accounts for the various planes of existence.

These planes are imagined to differ from one another,

but in reality they cannot be entirely detached and made separate from one another.

The activity of vibrations makes them grosser,

and thus the earth is born of the heavens. . . . "

(from: The Music of Life by Inayat Khan)

( ebaumsworld )

We create . . . we destroy. . . . we

create we . . . . destroy we. . . . . .

. . .recreate. . . . . to . . . . . . . . . .re

destroy to . . . . . . . . . . . .  recreate

to destroy . . . . . . . . .  . . . . . we re 

create to . . . . . .  . . . . . .destroy we

recreate to . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  de

cimate to . . . . . . . . . . . .recreate . . .

we de . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .cimate to

evolve

( wikipedia - supernova )

Fluidity

When creators

                               begin

                                                   exploring

                                                                            how the most expressive medium

is fluidity itself,

                                       then

we are truly entering a time (non/time)

                                     when the mediums of human creation and godly creation

merge

"And the earth was without form,

and void; and darkness was upon

the  face of the deep.  And

the Spirit of God 

moved upon

the face of the waters."

(Genesis: 1:2)

Two Parts (a channelling)

(well, about a week ago,

or less,

Makropoulos said she was done

with channelling,

and crazy convoluted entries.

Well, she lied.)

( noaa )

The sun and the material world (earth, moon, etc.)

are two parts of a whole

                  a hole whole

two parts have we

                       a yes and a no

two parts, equally:

the burning and the devouring,

the exploding and the imploding

the male and the female

are two parts of a whole,

                    a hole whole.

like

The sun and the material world.

( aerospaceguide )

The sun that we see

is the shimmering burning edges

of immortality;

it is the tearing tearing exit from

the void 

out of which we were produced;

the sun is the last thing

we saw when we

aborted, when we were propelled forth

from the womb of the

eternal,

when the 

whole

produced a hole

in which we were born --

we, being the substantial essence

of the whole that is both nothing

and all.

The sun and the material world

(earth, moon, etc.)

are two parts of a whole

a hole whole,

two parts have we

a yes and a no:

two parts, equally.

( mde-art )

Channelling: When Divided Time Meets No Time

(Preface: I don't know where this message came from.  If you can get through it,
and understand it, well,
I'll give you a piece of chocolate)

weber.edu

You see, in the New Age,

we will have to recognize and accept,

and forgive

the fact we are not one and never will be one --

we are parts, equal parts of a Whole, for sure,

but not One,

for God is the One.

It's impossible for us

to be one,

because we are all separate yet equal,

                                   different

parts of the whole that The One

produced

for the sole intent 

of being able to see                           

itself    . .  .  . . 

you see

this is what 2012 is:

it is                    

the year of the palindrome:

it is the year when

the Divided Self perceives the United Self, wholly, finally.

And Vise Versa.

 apod May 6 2011

As I said last week, how long can it take

for the Singular God (aka: the United Self)  to perceive 

its own Creation (aka: the Divided Self)

in all its parts?

Well, if you're on God's side 

of the mirror,

it takes an

unmeasurable instant

for the One to perceive 

its mirror image,

in all its disparate,

hopefully beautiful

parts.

But that instant

in Timeless Time

is an eternity on our side of the mirror --

paintingsilove

So anyway,

in the year of the palindrome,

God  (which is the linguistic placeholder

in our language used

to represent The Nothing Out of Which We All Came)

will have formed a conclusion

on what s/he thinks about the state

of her/his creation. 

                             (I hope you can follow what I'm saying)

I'm saying that by

12212012, D.T. (Divided, human time)

we, dear humans, will reach

the juncture at which 

the amount of time it takes the Creator to perceive It's Creation

intersects

with the numerical system we use to count the time.

That juncture, by the way,

can be best represented like this:

and that symbol,

dear friends,

is as much representational

as it is abstract.

Abstractly,

it is a number to indicate

no number:

the double zero,

so

to

speak.  And it is also representational 

(graphic):

it performs on the page

the intersection we

are about to experience.

The best way to describe it is an eclipse.

Now, we know about

Lunar Eclipses

boston.com

which occur when we, the earth that guides the moon

on its whirling, twirling path

stand directly in the way

of the moon's view of the sun.

It's an alignment that occurs because of a series of revolves

within revolves.

And then there are Solar Eclipses:

nationalgeographic


. and then there's something else,
that many people have speculated about:

infinitelymystical

 The eclipse we will encounter in a year or two
is much greater than the others,
it is the eclipse of one celestial habitation
as it comes in direct
alginment
with the larger force that it encircles,
and that keeps the celestial habitation
in motion,
just like the earth keeps the moon
in motion.

If you can foollow this,
then perhaps you'll be able to see
what I'm trying to say:

at this fabulous intersection,
all of creation (all of which exists
within the realm of Divided Time)
will be eclipsed by the force
that we call god,
and we
here on earth
will be in a position
where we will be gazing in
to God's eye,
as if gazing lengthwise along through the expanse
of the palindrome
of infinity.

And as with any eclipse
of the small
with the larger,
the smaller (we) will be able to see
the outline of the larger
around the the edges of the celestial bodies
between us.


~ ~ ~

The thing is:

the Unknown and Unknowable contains
the very force that produced
US,
and, well, we're about to have a good look at each other.

~ ~ ~ ~

And since we are, in essence,
a product of It, well,
the Unknown, the Unknowable, the Vast Emptyness
That is Everything Other Than Us
(let's just call that God, for the lack
of a better word),
so when God encounters us,
it will look upon us a bit
like a father looks at a son.  And if
S/He is not pleased
with what it sees,
well,
we may be screwed.

We are, after all,
just a product of division.

Yes.

For the One to Produce Many,
it must Divide.

Because one
cannot produce another one,
and remain the Only One.  No;
at that point when One becomes Two
it inevitably also become Three and Four and
on to Eternity

which is
12212012
or thereabouts.

Now,
the actual period of time
in our time
which summarizes
and translates the amount of time
that it takes NoTime to react to its perception of
All Time
is approxiamately four days,
give or take an hour or two,
and that four day juncture
that includes 12212012
will be kind of rough,
because for a brief
period of time,
when No Time meets All Time
we'll be in a state of,
well,
Frozen Time,
and there won't be much
we'll be able to do  about it,
except wait,
and it will seem like an eternity,
but it will really only be
four days,
give or take a minute or two,
and when
the big that after The Four Days occurs,
well,
we'll know the outcome
of the encounter of the All and Its Reproduction (aka US),
and those of us who survive
the intense interrogation
of Self against Self,

 will be in a time beyond eternity,
and in that time,
we'll finally realize
how insignificant
                   significance
really is.

contemplating the universe with Carl Sagan:

a contemplation:

there isn't too much else to say about that, except

for what I've said before

about reproduction,

representation,

creation

and the palindrome --

more to come soon!

12/10/2010: Channelling from 12/2/2010

please note:
I originally received this
on December 2,
or 3rd,
but didn't have time to post it.

So here goes:
hold onto your hats.
This one's a wild one:

1.
NPR just explained,
very neatly
how language evolves.

Think of this word,
and pronounce it to
yourself:

QATAR.

Can you say it?

Here is how our beloved
Wikipedia
tells us to pronounce it:

/ˈkɑːtɑr/  or kə-TAR

 But the truth of the matter is:
we're saying it wrong.
Because no one who
only speaks English
can say this word
properly;
instead
they say it like
"guitar."
        That's
what the Announcer on NPR said:
"when they told us
how to say it, they said
'say simply:


guitar.'"

So that's how anyone who spoke
both English and Arabic told people
to say
QATER.


In other words:
"guitar"
is what some old stinky English dude
whose parents had the cash
to put him through years of Arabic lessons
thought he heard
when he heard the word:
"Qatar."

Well, anyone who really
looks at that word
can see:
you don't say it like "guitar."
You say
Katar.


How do you say "Qatar"? from Northwestern News on Vimeo.

2.
Now, this
is where this all gets
kind of strange:

The problem with guitar,
is that it's based on a representation
of a sound,
but the sound
is only
a representation
of a code.

The written word is the first representation
that we ever had
of what
Originally occured

because

the written word
is like a camera;
it is the apparatus through which
we see
the first utterance
ever made

which was a sound.

The first utterance
which was also
the first representation
was a sound,
the sound
came through our being,
this tiny shell
of our being, our bodies --
the sound came --

This is really strange:
as you read this, think
in a line like this:

 So,
the first representation
produced by the Creative Being
when it sought to produce
Something Other Than Itself
was a sound,
a sound,
that,
in order to be heard
had to move
through an apparatus.

And that apparatus
aka: the material world
was produced as a
byproduct of
the first action of
production ==the reproduction
of the immaterial, and
that first reproduction
of the material world
went like this:

details right 'chere
below:

I know this sounds
absolutely insane,
but try to imagine a scenario
in which
there was nothing,
and nothing sought to produce
something;
but in order to be able to
produce something,
nothing
needed an apparatus of communication
aka: the material world.

The impetus of that
initial production
went
this way:

The physical
world,
then,
is like a
pair of glasses
through which
we perceive
the initial production,
which is
sound.

So,
likewise,
that which has been produced
(aka: the represented)
has to use the Material World

 ( Moore'sLore )

to present itself back
to the force that produced it,
in the first place,
so that force
might see
itself;
yes the represented
has to project back through
the apparatus
an impression of
what the perfect 
looks like
so the perfect can see it.

Try To Think Like This:

This is an image of
the represented
in its quest to show
the unrepresented
what it
sought to see.)

* ! *

Notably, there's a problem
if the apparatus
(read: The Material World,
aka: Life, the Earth, the Universe & Everything)
is new.
A new apparatus doesn't
understand how to represent
the represented,
because the represented
is so abstract.

Generally, in the case of new apparati,
when asked to represent the initially represented,
it gets all hung up on
the representation
of itself (ie: the Material World)
that is all
it can talk about,
when in fact
the realm of the unrepresented
wants to learn more:
wants to learn all
that is conceivable.

It is the job
of the representable
 to give it to them:
the representable has to render
into the language of the
unrepresented
exactly what it sees.
That's right:
exactly what it sees.

  
But the problem is:
the first thing we saw
occurred exactly at
the same time
as 
the first sound we heard,
and notably 
the first representation
was not
of a visible;
rahter;
it was of
an audible.




The visible came second
because we needed
the visible
to see
the representation we produced
so
the first representation
was a representation
of the audible:

But actually,
we hadn't conceived of any
of those symbols
at the beginning;
the best we could do
was

:

or something like this:

or this:

That was the first
representation
by
the apparatus through which
the represented needed
to travel
in order to communicate what it perceived
back to its origin.

That, only that,
the fragile
written word, or
the subtle, sung
note,
or the trembling, absolute
scream,
or
the drawing or
the painting or
the photograph

all serve to show us
every absolute dimension
of both the created,
material world,
(and its creator),
but
this is where it gets hard:
it has to be heard,
because the first representation
was the word.

There was only one word,
only one language
for a long time:

the real problem for us today
occurred at the moment
of Babel --
when the world broke in half,
and new words and pronunciations
happened,
the further away we got
from the soure,
and we reached a point where we
couldn't understand each other, anymore.

For awhile, we (our different nations) were
adrift,
alone,
talking only
to each other
and pronunciations changed
so radically
over time
that when one of us
on this side of the word
met those of another place,
and heard them say:
"I'm from Qatar"
we wrote down,
the best we could
what we thought we heard,
and told others to just
pronounce it
"guitar."

But
Qatar
is pronounced



and
M - I - S - S - I - P - P - I
is pronounced




That's just all there is to it.

In the realm of all that is represented,
the written word
comes first,
representing
the sound
of 
Knowledge.
And Knowledge
is the embodiment
of the ineffible.

So, repeat
after me:

Q - A - T - A - R,

or, 

better yet,

K'Tur.

12/4/2010: Channelling from 11/21/2010

Oh,
sometimes
I imagine my entries
are aggravating,
as I sit and write
the visions I have
as my energies channel through me.
For instance:
the following, 
which I actually wrote on 11/21/2010,
but I thought it was way out there,
and then I went to write again
last night
and liked what I wrote
but realized
I have to post this one first,
because,
(if you dare believe I'm receiving 
some special insights as I channel,
and if you dare believe
I'm 425 years old)
it appears 
the messages are coming
in some kind of order.
And so it begins:

Oh, sometimes
I imagine my entries
are aggravating, as I sit here
channelling my energies;
sometimes they're just
channeling, and there's
nothing coming through.
Just pure energy.
It pulls sideways on my
                       body,
the energy I channel,
like one of those long heavenly beams of sunlight,

(fatjohnnysfrontporch  - scrumptuous blog!)

That's kind of what the channel
I'm connected to looks
like.
We're all connected to channels,
wide open impulses
from our source; they
tell us how to move,
how to act;
they are like rainbows;
mine is shaped like this:

They generally say good things,
but sometimes a spot of blue,
or that which we interpret as blue,
passes our spectrum, and
our spectrum dulls,
and so too
does our spirit.

The beam pulls down;
it pulls, in my case,
from the upper right,
and down my side,
              and sometimes,
                                   it seems to be pulling me up,
pulling me toward it.

What I'm feeling when that happens
is the compulsion
that pulls us from life until death;
it shoots us
      out,
and we
and we
and we
                        start trying to get back,
but it says
             NO,
you can't come back yet,
you're not perfect yet.
You can't come back until
you feel you're perfect,
can't come back until
you perform at your very
highest level,
in the skill in which
you're required to perform.

You can come back when you're perfect.

It just so happens that
this particular draw
is getting harder right now for everyone,
                        saying:
I demand you
I require you
to be good -----
             if you cannot be good,
well, either you're going
         to carry on
       here on earth
in pretty grim conditions,
or not at all.


So learn to live on this earth properly,
in collaboration with her,
if you intend to stay on her.


That is the word I receive right now ---
profoundly and clearly:

Learn to live on this earth,
with these intended earthmates
properly
if you intend to stay here.

If you're fighting; if you're
arguing; if you're
not talking; if you're
raping; if you're lying; if
you're stealing;
if you're doing any such thing,
this is the time
to stop.
I tell you right now:
this is the time to stop.



The consequences of stopping:
an effortless transport to the
next realm of humanity.  And you don't
have to do anything more
than be fucking good.
You don't have to put
a dove in your front yard,
or a bumper sticker on your car;
you don't have to vote democrat or republican,
labor or conservative,
you don't even have to blog;
you don't have to picket;
no
you just have to be good,
and absolutely honest
with yourself and the rest of the world.

You don't have to wear
tennis shoes and drink
Kool Aid,
just keep being good;
the transport is
prepared, just
 keepbeinggood

be the best you can be,

and your journey to the next level will be easy,
more or less,
like Space Travel.



However,
however,
if we're being awful
at the end of time,
we'll feel it like a searing
hot --
poker isn't a strong enough word --
but it'll hurt like hell.

For those of us who
haven't been good at all,
the searing hot pain will last
 a very long time,
but
if we're lucky
we'll come out the other
end of it
kind of unscathed.
Kind of.

We're going to look like
shit
but there we'll be,
embodied,
yet again.

If the earth survives
the end of this cycle of time as we know it,
we'll live on earth.
                               If
the earth survives
at all.

That's really up to us.  The earth
is our only vessel.
There may be other vessles
like ours
with other creatures
on them,
all waiting
to return to
our shared source
and all doing it
in their own special way.


~ ~ ~



Now, there is another concept
I've talked about before:
the idea that we are all already occupying
avatars
right now.
Each avatar is designed to protect
and preserve
the aspect of the eternal
it is its duty to house.
Humans are, by nature,
beings of spirit;
the spirit
is one of our essences.
We enter the physical plane
in a most peculiar way, through
these lovely
extraordinary
physical beings;
we're all really sort of like
plants
on our earth's core,
feeding
off of her.  If we
feed her well in return, she will live,
maybe
could live
forever--


That was the magic
of the Garden of Eden:
Adam, Eve and the Gang
all knew that they were
just part of
the organization;
they were
the intellectual part
of the organism,
but they knew
their place
and their duty, and
they kept to it,
and
did it.


Since one of their essences
was/is
knowledge,
and part of knowledge
was/is
confidence,
this particular group of avatars
- Adam, Eve & the Gang -
had a tendency to occasionally decide
they were the only extra-special avatar,
and when humans decided
we were the only ones,
we ushered in the reign
of the material world.


As long as humans believed
that the material world
was made FOR them,
to SERVE them,
and
as long as humans believed
they were the greatest
creature on the earth,
well
the material has reigned,
and humans
have reveled in it,
like a pig in shit.

(atomblog)



Anyway, so we live
in the Material World
as we feel we possess it,
and as long as we feel
we possess it,
we will continue to live
in time
(and we'll continue to experience
the cycle
of birth, life and death)


However, the second
we realize
we are required to live
in harmony and cooperation
with every other sentient being
on this planet,
when we accept the fact
we're not the only ones,
and instead,
we're all in this together
(and when I say
we,
I mean:
humans,
animals,
plants,
fish,
rocks,
rivers,
sand,
sun,
sky,
fire,
planets,
etc.)
well,
when we realize we're all meant to work
together
equally,
we'll move out of the realm of the
United States of Materiality
and into a true
America.

Whole (an edited channelling)

1.

I had a dream

several months ago;

in it,

I was singing

with a multitude of people.

It was the end of time,

and we knew it.

Everyone was walking down streets

long and dark, like an alley,

a huge bowling alley;

so many people, 

so many voices.

And then a group broke off,

male and female, and I

was among them,

and we were singing

to a beautiful musical phrase:

we had no children

over and over again.

we had no children

we had no children

we had no children.

And we were exquisite;

every voice around me

was full and realized,

and every voice was

content with where it sat

in the face

of the singer,

and the singers each

were content

with their faces

that contained

their voices.

It was a joy to sing with them,

and I realized

most of my companions

were gay

or were single and childless,

like me,

and I was happy to be singing

with the choir of the childless

because

we each understood

the sources of our pain and

our voices sounded so good

together,

so we sang, as we marched 

down our narrow street;

we sang

we had no children

we had no children

we had no children

into the depth

of the endless

night.

2.

Some people wonder

why it seems

we have so many gay people

around,

so many

who have not reproduced.

?

Those who reproduce

are those

who are still evolving,

who do not yet recognize

the element of the opposite sex

we each contain,

or perhaps

they haven't developed 

their other halves

so well;

they're still predominantly 

just half.

either

male

or

female

(remember:

god broke in half

in order to be able to see

himherself,

but when they broke in 1/2

he actually had to double

themselves

because

god

was whole

and in order for whole

to see whole

it has to see

half & half

because

if whole

tries to see another whole

well,

it would just continuously

be disappearing

into the 

hole in the middle of whole

that appears

when whole tries

to double itself

; ; ; ;

so whole reproduces itself

by creating

two halves

to represent

the halves

that constitute the whole.

I've said this before.

We -- every part of creation --

are representatives

and representations

of the different aspects

of the whole;

and within each of our species

we continually represent the doubling of the

whole, of the 

entity

that is god.

just think of what happens in nature:

the halves

seperate,

but then become wholes

by doubling --

a continual repetition,

a continual reproduction,

of the act of reproduction

that the creative force

we choose to call God

initiated

when it felt the compulsion

to reproduce

itself.

As the 1/2s evolve,

the aspects in us that

are the essential aspects

of a whole god

emerge, 

and we begin containing

a little bit of each half

of the whole:

Thus, more and more

we are prone to see

people who contain

this doubleness,

and

those of us

who have been evolving

for awhile

from age to age

now occupy

avatars

that indicate

our wholeness

--

we contain a duality

--

a man in a female body;

a female in a male body,

and sometimes

we are attracted to another

just like us.

What else can I say?

I don't know for sure

why

a message like this is emerging;

it just is--

and I'm writing it.

(Actually, I'm editing it, too, 

because the original channelling

was quite a challenge.

But the message

was clear.)

Anyway,

so I'm singing with all these

gorgeous-voiced people

many gay,

many lesbian,

some like me,

all of us who

never reproduced,

not in this lifetime, at least;

we never really needed to reproduce

though we may have wanted to,

because,

some of us,

like me

contained a weeping memory

of reproduction

deep in our wombs.

We are the ones whose

spirits have evolved

to a point

maybe 

shy of wholeness.

And so we contain two in one.

For some of us,

on first sight,

we're way shy of normal,

but the more you get to know us

you see

we're not that bad,

and we're even appealling,

even

beautiful,

and we sure can sing.

And don't forget:

we can't help it==

we were born into these

avatars

that mark the stage we're at

in our spiritual development;

they are

bifacial,

biracial,

bisexual,

bicameral,

and we need them

to learn the lesson

we're here to learn

this time around,

and to help humankind

move

to the next stage it is meant

to arrive at.

soon.

Duet: Czeslaw Milosz & Hazrat Inayat Khan (I do believe both are tenors)

Dependence belongs to matter

and independence to spirit.

The independent spirit becomes dependent through manifestation.

When the One becomes many, then each part of the One,

being limited, strives to be helped

by the other part,

for each part finds itself

imperfect.

Therefore we human beings,

however rich

with the treasures of heaven and earth,

are poor in reality because

of our dependence upon others. 

The spiritual view makes one conscious

of this fact, but the material view

blinds man, who then show independence

and indifference to his fellow man.

Pride, conceit and vanity

are the outcome of this ignorance.

There are moments when even the king has to depend

upon a most insignificant person.

. . . . .

As individuals depend upon other individuals,

so nations and races depend upon

one another.  

No individual can say that he can geet on without anyone else,

and no nation can be really happy

while another nation is unhappy.

But both individuals and communities depend most

upon God, in whom we all unite.

(Hazrat Inayat Kahn The Unity of Religious Ideals)

a pinch of the imperfect (an imperfect channelling)

*

"If the entire human species were a single individual, that person would long ago have been declared mad. The insanity would not lie in the anger and darkness of the human mind—though it can be a black and raging place indeed. And it certainly wouldn't lie in the transcendent goodness of that mind—one so sublime, we fold it into a larger "soul." The madness would lie instead in the fact that both of those qualities, the savage and the splendid, can exist in one creature, one person, often in one instant."  (Jeffrey Kugler, "What Makes Us Moral?" Time Magazine 3 March 2007)

This is a difficult concept to grasp,

that we are two in one,

we, the human occupying the human 

body

are two in one --

we each contain the 

ability

to be good

to be bad

all at the same time,

we 

all

are 

two, and the two we contain

are the imitation 

of the part of God

that became manifest

as the moment of the splitting,

the splitting being

the physical act God

had to produce

             in order

to be able to reproduce

Himself.

God had to split

in half, into

the negative and the positive,

in order to see:

                 the positive

                       is what She saw,

the glorious, succulent

material present

( ishs.org )

that is what God saw:

the visual, the 

aural, the

tactile,

the

sensual, the

aromatic,

all that IS

is what God saw:

all that IS

is good is bad

is what God saw

 ( howstuffworks )

So . . . . .  .

 

if God saw the all that he created,

and it was good,

what in heaven's name was doing the seeing?

WHAT saw it all,

and WHAT was glad?

 

What did the seeing was always that

which could not be seen,

the negative,

the negative -

the negative !

the other side of the 

dichotomy,

in Derridean terms:

MALE                     FEMALE

positive                  negative

light                    dark

day                       night

spoken                           silent

visible                        invisible

 

 We live in the realm of the visible,

of the male,

but it was our opposite -

that was there

but not there

to view the creation

and to be amazed by it.

( wikipedia: michelangelo )

Ever since the onset of the Renaissance

(when Makropoulos was 

born,

by the way)

that glorious time

when the mind had evolved to a more mature

level of being able to reproduce

itself,

ever since then, 

the trend 

has been to focus

on the male:

the physical manifestion

that god produced in order to be able

to see Herself --

and hey

wouldn't you want to fixate

on that for awhile?

wouldn't you want to fixate on that

fabulous something

that you created

in order to see

yourself?

Imagine it:

here you are, 

you are invisible and

undivisable,

and you just created

something visibly 

you,

you gave yourself 

the opportunity to see

yourself

in the mirror

wouldn't you want

to look at it

for a thousand years

or so?

Wouldn't you want to see it,

just turn it over and over

in your hands

and adore it?

( geekology )

It would be

your perfect opposite,

your mythic soulmate:

there you'd be

and you would be so amazed

at the beauty of it,

you would gaze into it,

get lost in it.

(Mirrors have been the replacement for

the absence of the Others;

they've been here to keep us

company, and to let us know

what we look like, so

when we see our other halves,

we'll recognize them.)

So that was the moment

of splitting,

the moment

of making visible

ourselves,

that was it - the first act that all 

creation has been doomed

ever since

to repeat and represent.

Every physical entity on earth

contains within it an imitation

of that moment of splitting

 

The sperm (the physical

projectile born

of the desire to

see and be with the 

Other

                (so completely),

yes the sperm is

the physical imitation of the desire

to enter into

the engulfing presence

of the engenderer.

(if you can figure that one out,

you get a gold star---)

 

* * *

 

because the Other to the physical creation

is so Beautiful

that the physical creation

wants, immediately

to penetrate and become

part of it again.

Something like that.

)

( pixabella )

Every physical entity on earth

contains within it an imitation

of that moment of splitting

Indeed, that includes

the human,

the creature doomed

to strut and fret

our time upon this stage,

we, our body-avatars,

and the trinity 

of liquidity

we each contain

are all the imitation

of what god produced and saw

at that moment of dividing

in half,

              but the problem,

              as Isaac Luria helps us see,

was that the creation

of the duplication

of God produced

such a force

[the power of God]

made manifest

         at the moment

              of this production,

there was such an explosion,

( baylor )

like fireworks,

 That

 

is the manifestation

of the power

of 

GOD

 

 

 

( 2005 Cosmic Explosion - NASA)

I'm serious.

( space.com )

 . . . . and at the moment of the bang,

everything

became visible

physical,

ie:

it was created.

(It's that simple!)

 

 (Space.com2 ) 

 

 So, anyway,

at that mment of explosion and 

production,

the negative,              the positive

the unseen,                     the seen,

the unheard                        the heard

the unfelt,                 the felt

came to be.

it's that simple, 

those concepts

and all they signify

came to be

be 

cause

of creation

and the creative urge.

So we live in the physical realm, because that's the

half of God we

occupy,

but 

that doesn't preclude

the existence of the

non existent.

It's just there,

and all that it (the non-existent) contains

is the negative

of the totality

that is the manifest

in

the physical.

(That's a hard concept to grasp

when you live in the physical.)

But as I said,

the problem

                        and the beauty

                 of it all

is that each of us

contains

an imitation

of that doubling

to one extent or the other.

So Luria helps me say: god created

the imitation of

god, male and female

so they could see

themselves,

but the energy produced at that 

moment

was too great

for the illusion,

the representation

to remain while,

so it exploded and shattered

into pieces

and the pieces 

got the unenviable job

of picking up the pieces

and having to put them back

together 

again.

And that's what we've been doing

for millenia,

and god

in Her distant place, delighted

at the delightful games

of Her children BUT

got disturbed if the Boys

got too rough

*

please think semiotically

*

ANYWAY,

all species also imitate

the duality and the moment

of creation

and the Desire

to Reproduce,

over and over because

that desire

and compulsion

has maintained

our existence

giving us

time

to evolve

our minds,

our souls,

our spirits

our goods and our evils,

all the intangible

invisible

entities that

the frail human body

was appointed

to contain and sustain in

the delicate cases

we encase:

our brains,

our hearts,

our solar plexus,

our stomachs, which provide

the protective shield for containing

the unprotectable.

( science-nationalgeographic )

Our fingers,

our ears,

our eyes 

represent

the fingers,

ears,

eyes

of God

 made manifest

at the moment when We

confronted

our eact opposites, 

those which contains

our good and our bad,

we,

who contain

God's essences

     imitate

that moment of looking, too,

which also includes the moment

of being disappointed

because our Other

our Creation

isn't perfect,

wasn't perfect,

won't be perfect,

won't be Us

completely

because if God's

Other Half

was perfect,

God wouldn't be able to see it,

because He would be it.

 

that's right :

we wouldn't have to divide ourselves

in an attempt to see

ourselves

if we didn't contain 

a pinch

of the imperfect.

Oh, now you,

dear reader who dared

to make it this far,

you wonder:

where the hell is this going?

As I sit and read this,

I know what it says.

It says:

I even I

with my changeable moods,

my unchartable soul,

my angry temper

my fits of elation

and tearful, lonely evenings

I contain 

an imitation

of God at the moemnt

tHEy

(male and female)

let the pinch of imperfection

influence itself and deicde

to divide 

so it could see itself

I imitate that moment

of god's self-consciousness,

and imitate

the entity he saw,

the entity that was 

too great

to be whole,

so it exploded

and became 

the scattered remnants

of the visible

             reproduction of God--

and the shattering, glimmering parts of the fractured god 

regrouped

 - so to speak -

and became

planets and stars

and plants and animals

all 

species,

all with our different task,

as we have worked together over the ages,

striving to reproduce the whole,

and humans had the job

of building the connections ,

and over time we have evolved

and we have reached

a

near perfect

connection

I can sit in my living room and see and talk to 

in real time

a friend of mine

in Singapore.

We're so close to being the complete unity

we're supposed to be

but we have 

one problem:

 

we each still feel we're different from each other.

We are at a cusp.

We each have to recognize

that in our individual selves

though we reproduce both parts of god,

still,

within our individual selves

we can really only contain 

half,

and somewhere there

is the Other 

half of us

with whom,

when we're together

we produce a melting

into One, just One

 

 

this applies equally to 

individuals,

families,

states,

nations,

worlds. . . .

*

And you see we each

have to recognize

and admit

that in containing 

the parts of god, we must

also contain god's opposite,

which is 

evil

because evil is something 

God created, 

so we would all know good.

God is all,

and so are we,

but we

just happen to be

fractured all,

the physical part of God

that God produced

when God felt the desire

to see

the self.

( tikkun )

Do we want to See God

in our time?

Well, you know,

the only way we can do that

is to act like the gods

we were born to be,

which means

we need to recognize

that the man and the woman

the most opposite

of ourselves

is one essential piece

in the visible puzzle

of the perfect picture

of the product of god.

We need

to forgive ourselves

our faults

and forgive our

brothers their faults

and forgive the Others:

the dark,

the female,

the strange,

the silent,

as they must do

unto us.

It's that flippin' easy.

Jesus said it too,

but he was rendered a sound bite.

Still,

his message 

never changed.

The most essential part

of this simple task is

that we must be honest

with ourselves

first,

and see our flaws,

and once we honestly

acknowledge

the wrong we ourselves

have committed or contemplated,

we can also look past

what we view

as the wrongs in others.

I'm not saying we should get rid 

of our negative impulses.

We can't.

But we should acknowledge

them,

live with them,

find 

an arena in which we can

act on them 

so no one gets hurt

and get on with the task

of saving our earth,

that is,

if we do indeed enjoy this joy ride we've been on

enough

to want to see it survive beyond

the next step

in our evolution.

 

Panorama of Grand Canyon Village Lookout supplied by Panoramic Earth

 

 (panaromic earth)